Ethernet Routers RB2011iL-IN

RB2011iL-IN

RB2011iL-IN
SKU RB2011iL-IN
Brochure rb2011L-IN.pdf
Manual RouterOS software manual
Quantity in stock 20 item(s) available
 
$94.00
Market price: $99.00, Save $5.00
Save 5%
Quantity Price
40-99 Items $89.00
100-499 Items $84.00
500+ Items $79.00
*Note:
Quantity (from 1 to 20)

Description

The RB2011 is a low cost multi port device series. Designed for indoor use, and available in many different cases, with a multitude of options. 

The RB2011L-IN is the most basic model, with five Gigabit ethernet ports, five Fast ethernet ports, power jack and PoE support. 
 
It’s powered by the new Atheros next generation 600MHz 74K MIPS network processor and has 64MB of RAM and a Level4 RouterOS license. 
 
RouterBOARD 2011L-IN comes with desktop enclosure and power supply. 
 
Wall mount kit for network closet is available for purchase as an optional accessory.
 

Product specifications

Details
Product code RB2011L-IN
CPU speed 600MHz
RAM 64MB
Architecture MIPS-BE
LAN ports 10
Gigabit 5
MiniPCI 0
Integrated Wireless No
PoE 8-28V DC on Ether1
Voltage Monitor No
PCB temperature monitor No
CPU temperature monitor No
Dimensions 214x86mm
Temperature range -35C to +65C
RouterOS License L4
Current Monitor No
CPU AR9344
Max Power consumption 6W

Performance test results

RB2011L-IN 100M + Gigabit Ethernet port test (600Mhz) RouterOS v6.0rc5  
Mode Configuration 64 byte 512 byte 1518 byte
kpps Mbps kpps Mbps kpps Mbps
Bridging none (fast path) 269.6 176.9 232 983.7 122 1499.1
Bridging 25 Bridge filter rules 87.6 57.5 86 364.6 83.6 1027.3
Routing none (fast path) 226.9 148.8 210 890.4 122 1499.1
Routing 25 Simple Queues) 106.6 69.9 103.9 440.5 100.5 1234.9
Routing 25 IP filter rules 60.5 39.7 59.6 252.7 56.8 698.0
  1. All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544)
  2. Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes
  3. Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out
  4. Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results
: *
: *
: *