RB750GL

RB750GL
SKU RB750GL
Brochure B750GL.pdf
Manual RouterOS software manual
Quantity in stock 20 item(s) available
 
$56.00
Market price: $59.00, Save $3.00
Save 5%
Quantity Price
40-99 Items $53.00
100-499 Items $50.00
500+ Items $47.00
*Note:
Quantity (from 1 to 20)

Description

The RB750GL is a small SOHO router in a white plastic case. 

It has five independent Gigabit Ethernet ports and optional switch chip functionality for wire speed Gigabit throughput. It’s probably the most affordable MPLS capable Gigabit router on the market and now it is even more affordable than before. Compared to the previous model, the RB750GL has almost the same performance, but is significantly lower cost, only $59.95! 
 
With it’s compact design and clean looks, it will fit perfectly into any SOHO environment. 
 
Box contains: RB750GL, plastic case, power adapter
 

Product specifications

Details
Product code RB750GL
CPU speed 400MHz
Architecture MIPS-BE
RAM 64MB
LAN ports 5
Gigabit Yes
MiniPCI 0
miniPCI-e 0
Integrated Wireless 0
Power Jack 8-30V DC
PoE 8-30V
Voltage Monitor No
CPU temperature monitor No
Dimensions 113x89x28mm. Weight without packaging and cables: 129g
Operating System RouterOS
Temperature range -30C to +70C
RouterOS License Level4
Current Monitor No
Max Power consumption 5W

Performance test results

RB750GL Gigabit Ethernet test (400Mhz) RouterOS v6.0rc6  
Mode Configuration 64 byte 512 byte 1518 byte
kpps Mbps kpps Mbps kpps Mbps
Bridging none (fast path) 194.0 127.3 178.4 756.6 81.2 997.8
Bridging 25 Bridge filter rules 53.7 35.2 52.3 221.9 51.5 633.0
Routing none (fast path) 183.7 120.5 167.0 708.1 81.2 997.8
Routing 25 Simple Queues) 92.8 60.8 88.5 375.1 81.2 997.8
Routing 25 IP filter rules 37.5 24.6 38.4 162.6 37.6 462.4
  1. All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544)
  2. Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes
  3. Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out
  4. Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results
: *
: *
: *